Defining an m-cluster category
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Defining an m−cluster category
In this paper, starting with a simply laced root system, we define a triangulated category which we call the m-cluster category, and we show that it encodes the combinatorics of the m-clusters of Fomin and Reading in a fashion similar to the way the cluster category of Buan, Marsh, Reineke, Reiten, and Todorov encodes the combinatorics of the clusters of Fomin and Zelevinsky. For Φ any root sys...
متن کاملOn exact category of $(m, n)$-ary hypermodules
We introduce and study category of $(m, n)$-ary hypermodules as a generalization of the category of $(m, n)$-modules as well as the category of classical modules. Also, we study various kinds of morphisms. Especially, we characterize monomorphisms and epimorphisms in this category. We will proceed to study the fundamental relation on $(m, n)$-hypermodules, as an important tool in the study of a...
متن کاملThe symmetric monoidal closed category of cpo $M$-sets
In this paper, we show that the category of directed complete posets with bottom elements (cpos) endowed with an action of a monoid $M$ on them forms a monoidal category. It is also proved that this category is symmetric closed.
متن کاملCategory and subcategories of (L,M)-fuzzy convex spaces
Inthispaper, (L,M)-fuzzy domain finiteness and (L,M)-fuzzy restricted hull spaces are introduced, and several characterizations of the category (L,M)-CS of (L,M)-fuzzy convex spaces are obtained. Then, (L,M)-fuzzy stratified (resp. weakly induced, induced) convex spaces are introduced. It is proved that both categories, the category (L,M)-SCS of (L,M)-fuzzy stratified convex spaces and the cate...
متن کاملCategory Mistakes in M&E∗
A widely accepted account of causation (Lewis, 1973) asserts: (1) If F and E both occur but F would not have occurred unless E had occured, then E causes F . This obviously implies (2) One’s birth causes one’s death. an extremely odd result. But is it a counter-example? Lewis (2000) suggests that the oddness of (2) is due not to obvious falsity but to being “too obvious to be worth mentioning” ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Algebra
سال: 2007
ISSN: 0021-8693
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2007.09.012